View Full Version : Hobby Master F22
gary ford
23rd November 2009, 11:32
Link to Hawkonvoodoos site and first pre-pro pics of the HM F22 Raptor. This model comes with detailed weapons bays.
link http://www.hobbymastercollector.com/HA2801Pre-productionPhotos.html
tc2324
23rd November 2009, 13:09
That weapons bay looks very impresive,:cool: but will you have the option to close it?:unsure:
Shawn 507
23rd November 2009, 13:23
It looks like you should be able to have a buttoned up option. Very impressive model so far.
That weapons bay looks very impresive,:cool: but will you have the option to close it?:unsure:
p-51d
23rd November 2009, 14:13
This one looks very, very cool.:cool
mar_ji
23rd November 2009, 14:17
will surely get one....finally....after months of waiting....:) ;)
muesingman
23rd November 2009, 20:42
A hard job for CW this time if they want to be better... on the other hand I cannot imagine that their effort will be worse and I am quite sure that I will wait until it will be released - I want at least to compare them both before I make my final decision.
Nighthawk
23rd November 2009, 22:02
Potential to be iconic, but more questions than answers from those shots.
sufapilot
24th November 2009, 00:00
Thanks for the post. I like what I'm seeing from the pre-pro shots so far and it's looks promising. I wonder how the canopy will be treated - gold or smoke tinted? At any rate, this model won't be a deal-breaker for me regardless of the outcome....
Shawn 507
24th November 2009, 00:15
At this point, I could go for the anti-glare pinkish tint seen on military binos. I'd love to here the hollowing on that.:D
Thanks for the post. I like what I'm seeing from the pre-pro shots so far and it's looks promising. I wonder how the canopy will be treated - gold or smoke tinted? At any rate, this model won't be a deal-breaker for me regardless of the outcome....
Cardinal
24th November 2009, 05:02
At this point, I could go for the anti-glare pinkish tint seen on military binos. I'd love to here the hollowing on that.:D
Would that be to complement your 'rose-tinted' glasses Shawn ... ? :D :LOL:
Shawn 507
24th November 2009, 05:24
No I just like Pink. She is a good singer;)
Would that be to complement your 'rose-tinted' glasses Shawn ... ? :D :LOL:
Cardinal
24th November 2009, 08:31
No I just like Pink. She is a good singer;)
No argument there ... :cool: :LOL:
(BTW, do you think Pink is referring to the DAF when she sings "This used to be a fun house, but now it's filled with evil clowns"? :D :LOL:
Angels-1-5
24th November 2009, 13:24
In comparison if there is actually one, does or will it absolutely blow out of the water my gaincorp F22 that i recently purchased for Ģ12?
Shawn 507
24th November 2009, 14:59
Nah, she probably doesn't know about this gang of men who still play with toys, err I mean highly thought of collectible miniatures.:rolleyes:
No argument there ... :cool: :LOL:
(BTW, do you think Pink is referring to the DAF when she sings "This used to be a fun house, but now it's filled with evil clowns"? :D :LOL:
highnoon1966
8th January 2010, 06:41
Pre pro pictures of HA2801 F22 Raptor added to hobbymaster collector site.
http://www.hobbymastercollector.com/HA2801F-22Langley27th.html
b-huj
8th January 2010, 13:15
From the pictures, the model looks quite good, and following are my concerns:
1) intakes sport huge gaps between metal and plastic parts, needs to be fixed
2) under the cockpit, there is a huge gap between upper and lower halves of model...hopefully they'll address that problem. Wish they'd never chosen to split pieces like that.
3) radome shape is a bit off (maybe too late for fixes), the bottom's shape should be a little bit more round, not so pointy.
4) those black polygons on top and grey ones near the main gear should probably be the same color: dark metallic (gun metal)
5) the trim should be the same color as the cockpit frame, and lighter tone of grey. Very good choice of matte paint there.
I guess since the release date is so near, there is little chance they'll be touching up the tooling any further, and what we see is pretty much the production model.
p-51d
8th January 2010, 21:05
From the pictures, the model looks quite good, and following are my concerns:
1) intakes sport huge gaps between metal and plastic parts, needs to be fixed
2) under the cockpit, there is a huge gap between upper and lower halves of model...hopefully they'll address that problem. Wish they'd never chosen to split pieces like that.
3) radome shape is a bit off (maybe too late for fixes), the bottom's shape should be a little bit more round, not so pointy.
4) those black polygons on top and grey ones near the main gear should probably be the same color: dark metallic (gun metal)
5) the trim should be the same color as the cockpit frame, and lighter tone of grey. Very good choice of matte paint there.
I guess since the release date is so near, there is little chance they'll be touching up the tooling any further, and what we see is pretty much the production model.
Huge gaps?, you must be joking.:rolleyes:
klepto4
8th January 2010, 21:13
From the pictures, the model looks quite good, and following are my concerns:
1) intakes sport huge gaps between metal and plastic parts, needs to be fixed
2) under the cockpit, there is a huge gap between upper and lower halves of model...hopefully they'll address that problem. Wish they'd never chosen to split pieces like that.
3) radome shape is a bit off (maybe too late for fixes), the bottom's shape should be a little bit more round, not so pointy.
4) those black polygons on top and grey ones near the main gear should probably be the same color: dark metallic (gun metal)
5) the trim should be the same color as the cockpit frame, and lighter tone of grey. Very good choice of matte paint there.
I guess since the release date is so near, there is little chance they'll be touching up the tooling any further, and what we see is pretty much the production model.
You forgot the deep trenches aswell (panel lines):(
Shawn 507
9th January 2010, 00:40
Well since everyone is convinced its the CW model. I guess HM should just stop messing with other brands. It didn't work out with Corgi and the Predators. And now the highly praised CW mold has turned out to be a lemon.:LOL:
But its looks better than the other F-22s out there, and I'm happy to have pre-ordered it.
From the pictures, the model looks quite good, and following are my concerns:
1) intakes sport huge gaps between metal and plastic parts, needs to be fixed
2) under the cockpit, there is a huge gap between upper and lower halves of model...hopefully they'll address that problem. Wish they'd never chosen to split pieces like that.
3) radome shape is a bit off (maybe too late for fixes), the bottom's shape should be a little bit more round, not so pointy.
4) those black polygons on top and grey ones near the main gear should probably be the same color: dark metallic (gun metal)
5) the trim should be the same color as the cockpit frame, and lighter tone of grey. Very good choice of matte paint there.
I guess since the release date is so near, there is little chance they'll be touching up the tooling any further, and what we see is pretty much the production model.
muesingman
9th January 2010, 21:14
Only a small detail, but I canīt help it since it just strikes my eye at first sight: the pilotīs helmet should be grey, shouldnīt it?
Apart from this, I agree that it will be very, very hard for CW to do a better job on this subject (if theyīre still occupied with this subject at all).
b-huj
10th January 2010, 15:28
Honestly, comparing these pictures with those old ones of the CW prototype on the other thread, I am quite sure they're the exact same tooling. I thought it was common knowledge CW contracts HM (or the same manufacturer in China) to make their models. I am not aware of CW reviving their F-22 programme...am I missing something??
Virtual_pilot
10th January 2010, 17:45
i don't think I am gonna get that HM F-22. It looks nothing attractive so far compare to CW or even other planes HM made.
Shawn 507
11th January 2010, 01:51
But everyone swears its the CW model. ;) Why would you not be impressed by it now that HM used their model?:LOL:
i don't think I am gonna get that HM F-22. It looks nothing attractive so far compare to CW or even other planes HM made.
The Defiant Man
11th January 2010, 11:02
You forgot the deep trenches aswell (panel lines):(
Strange.....the Corgi House Style....:rolleyes: :LOL:
Aeolus
11th January 2010, 14:27
Compare CW and HM pics-both have layer or layers of primer/paint on them-CW panel lines are sharper, not shallower just sharper, without soft edges seen on HM model-no need to ridicule someone for his opinion.
hawkonevoodoo
11th January 2010, 16:19
First, these are pre-pro photos and comments have been sent HM.
Secondly, the mold for the F-22 is completely, absolutely 100% Hobby Master. No other company had anything to do with this mold or this project.
Thirdly, read secondly over again.
Thanks guys.
Max Reheat
11th January 2010, 17:08
Thirdly, read secondly over again.
:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :wacko:
Thanks for clearing that up Hawk, maybe peeps will believe you and Gary one day :rolleyes:
Still think this model should have no, or very nearly no panel lines, will have to wait for the Witty one :unsure: :wacko: :D
Virtual_pilot
11th January 2010, 18:44
Say guys, is that raptor by HM a desert strom livary?
I am already seeing a 64$ pricing on that model.
djjeffhall
11th January 2010, 23:08
I'm excited that Hobby Master is tackling this bird. I'm not a big jet guy, but I'll be adding one of these to the flight line.
11SQNLDR
12th January 2010, 02:54
Say guys, is that raptor by HM a desert strom livary?
I am already seeing a 64$ pricing on that model.
That pricing was released quite a while back, September or October from memory. Good value really - if it was CW releasing it the price would be closer to $90.
Shawn 507
12th January 2010, 03:08
No joke there. It would probably break the $100 USD mark if CW were making one.
if it was CW releasing it the price would be closer to $90.
Kiwi Dave
12th January 2010, 06:22
Say guys, is that raptor by HM a desert strom livary?
I am already seeing a 64$ pricing on that model.
Not yet! Might be the first F-22 to be downed... by a F-5A!:D
andrewvft
12th January 2010, 09:52
Hey Hawk,
did you also ask about the stand? I nice stand? Pretty Please?
hawkonevoodoo
12th January 2010, 15:08
Hey Hawk,
did you also ask about the stand? I nice stand? Pretty Please?
I will try to get a photo of the stand but it could take a day or two. I'll post it on http://hobbymastercollector.com/HA2801F-22Langley27th.html on my site when I get one. If I can get one.
johnnyboy
14th March 2010, 10:47
Seems strange that a thread over on TDHB has been going a few days in fact since the Production pictures of the F22 have been up on Voodoo 1 site yet not a word on here, As the title says I today have cancelled my pre-order. I know that panel line/gaps are a deal breaker to many but H/M have reached a new low in QC with this one, How anyone would send this model out to be used in publication reviews is beyond me. It might be just this one that has the problems but I am not willing to take chance.
http://www.hobbymastercollector.com/files/HA2801-3bFP.jpg
no4mkit
14th March 2010, 15:36
Good call JB. Forget Corgi, that's more like 1970's Dinky Toy house style judging by the gaps. :rolleyes:
highnoon1966
14th March 2010, 18:21
Good call JB. Forget Corgi, that's more like 1970's Dinky Toy house style judging by the gaps. :rolleyes:
Looks terrible. F22 not exactly a beauty and HM have definately done it no favours, looks a right munter :rolleyes:
CFBC
14th March 2010, 18:31
Looks terrible. F22 not exactly a beauty and HM have definately done it no favours, looks a right munter :rolleyes:
that's more like 1970's Dinky Toy house style judging by the gaps. :rolleyes:
. I know that panel line/gaps are a deal breaker to many but H/M have reached a new low in QC with this one
Hmm, have to say it don't look good at all, but I have a pre-pro sat in my desk and it looks nothing like. Looks well fitted, however if some of the production versions have got out like that, not good...
Let's hope it's just a one off... :rolleyes: :D
johnnyboy
14th March 2010, 18:46
I understand that the pre-pro has a lot better finish paint wise and unlike that production version has a better canopy why I wonder have H/M have changed the way it has painted the finished model? I bet it has come down to cost:wacko: A very dangerous move if this flops sale wise and judging from the comments across the pond that might be the case. With another 2 coming from other manufacturers I am going to hold fire till they hit the shops before handing my CC details over.
CFBC
14th March 2010, 19:21
I understand that the pre-pro has a lot better finish paint wise
Hi JB,
I have no idea to be honest and normally it is the otherway around with ill fitting parts, etc and gaps needing tightning on the pre-pro... Very :confused: indeed.
As to the canopy and paint finish, etc..... Interesting. ;) :)
Craig
14th March 2010, 19:28
Hi JB,
I have no idea to be honest and normally it is the otherway around with ill fitting parts, etc and gaps needing tightning on the pre-pro... Very :confused: indeed.
As to the canopy and paint finish, etc..... Interesting. ;) :)
The canopy is an odd one, surely no-one would want to display it open with a whopping great hinge like that? It'd be a scale foot from the fuselage, at least! :eek:
ZS-VAN
14th March 2010, 19:34
Hmm, have to say it don't look good at all, but I have a pre-pro sat in my desk and it looks nothing like. Looks well fitted, however if some of the production versions have got out like that, not good...
Let's hope it's just a one off... :rolleyes: :D
Was the one you saw a pre-pro or the final version? :unsure:
planenuts
14th March 2010, 21:13
This one is going to be a definite wait and see now:wacko:
HM, what have you done to me:(
CFBC
14th March 2010, 21:24
Was the one you saw a pre-pro or the final version? :unsure:
Pre-pro and it's sat here on my desk... ;) :)
mar_ji
21st March 2010, 01:31
Pre-pro and it's sat here on my desk... ;) :)
its a "What you see is what you get" game....just wait till its in the stores..:p :)
andrewvft
25th March 2010, 12:58
My main issue with the HM F-22 are the gaps on the intakes and underneath the cockpit. I can see light from the other side of the model. Also, the flight stick is glued on backwards
ruger357
25th March 2010, 15:00
I ended up canceling mine also.
TankBuster
25th March 2010, 17:50
Even if the model was perfect it would still look bad just like the real thing... An orrible looking wedgy pointy thing. Yuk!
TankBuster
parsig9
28th April 2010, 04:20
Looks like a Raptor to me. Don't feel like messing with the loadout tonight but maybe tomorrow. I wish the canopy had the gold shimmer like I've seen but I like it and find the HOVD review accurate and fair.
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l186/parsig9/IMG_0693.jpg
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l186/parsig9/IMG_0694.jpg
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l186/parsig9/IMG_0695.jpg
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l186/parsig9/f22.jpg
Aeolus
28th April 2010, 10:09
All is nice looking from above, unfortunately underside is not so. Have two, both have same gap problems, definitely wont buy more-shame:mad:
11SQNLDR
28th April 2010, 11:00
Mine passes the 6ft test... but any closer & my eyes are drawn to the ugly seam line. NOT what i've come to expect from HM & pretty disappointed:mad:
http://i564.photobucket.com/albums/ss83/thecolespiccies/Diecast%20Collection/various295.jpg
Edward Papazian
28th April 2010, 14:25
I think that the gap in question, while certainly not desirable, isn't as bad looking in normal light as I expected. Despite this and some other issues, I think that HM's F-22 is a passable rendition of this warbird----in contrast to its apparently mediocre 1:48th scale P-51D. I hope that HM does better by the upcoming Spitfire MK I, though the lack of pictures of this model has me concerned. One thing that HM seem to be very slow in learning is the importance of stenciling, especially on larger sized models. It makes a significant difference, in my opinion, and isn't a burdensome cost for the manufacturer to bear.
Shawn 507
28th April 2010, 16:23
Mine isn't as bad. It passes the 3 ft test, and more important. It looks much better than the GC model I saw up close.
http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/uu276/BoogersDad/DSCF0001-3.jpg
Diamond nine
28th April 2010, 19:40
Thanks for the pic's guy's.Its not like HM at all,those gaps are just not like them.I do have this on pre-order and am still going ahead with it,looking forward to having this one landing soon.:)
KO-B
28th April 2010, 19:51
I think that the gap in question, while certainly not desirable, isn't as bad looking in normal light as I expected. Despite this and some other issues, I think that HM's F-22 is a passable rendition of this warbird----in contrast to its apparently mediocre 1:48th scale P-51D. I hope that HM does better by the upcoming Spitfire MK I, though the lack of pictures of this model has me concerned. One thing that HM seem to be very slow in learning is the importance of stenciling, especially on larger sized models. It makes a significant difference, in my opinion, and isn't a burdensome cost for the manufacturer to bear.
A good point, and I think this is as, if not more effective in enhancing the model's realism as trying to include every last panel line and rivet.
Re the Spit, as long as it's up to the better Griffon releases I'll be pretty happy.
Back to the F22 and the dreaded gaps, the recent photos (particularly Shawn's) certainly look a lot better than others I've seen. Maybe hope for the Mustang yet.
KO-B
Dutchie
28th April 2010, 20:35
Thanks a lot for the pictures guys. I pre-ordered one to add as a new model to the collection. Can't say good or not so good, at the moment:rolleyes: :)
kevjb64
29th April 2010, 19:37
Thanks a lot for the pictures guys. I pre-ordered one to add as a new model to the collection. Can't say good or not so good, at the moment:rolleyes: :)
I picked mine up today and all in all I would say good . My cockpit hood fits well , a problem a few non forum member friends have suffered with . My joint gap is probably somewhere between the two already posted , so lets say it passes the four and a half foot test , :rolleyes: :D ;) within my personal limit . :)
Dutchie
29th April 2010, 20:00
I picked mine up today and all in all I would say good . My cockpit hood fits well , a problem a few non forum member friends have suffered with . My joint gap is probably somewhere between the two already posted , so lets say it passes the four and a half foot test , :rolleyes: :D ;) within my personal limit . :)
Good to hear you are happy with it Kev:cool: :)
STARMAN 352ND
30th April 2010, 03:56
I got the F-22 and i had the one with a eye sore gap .....Well i didn't let it bother me because in the past i have always manage to find a way to fix things.
This is really simple to do all you need is Elmers white glue and Model Master Acryl Dark Gull Gray 4755 is the perfect match.
Then all you need to do it mix the paint with the glue really good and then use a wide flat brush and seal the gap once you do that you can take a damp cloth or wet finger or Q-tip and wipe off the extra paint and this is what you get...
Gap sealed no problems.
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k105/STARMAN39/IMG_7334.jpg
p-51d
30th April 2010, 07:02
I got the F-22 and i had the one with a eye sore gap .....Well i didn't let it bother me because in the past i have always manage to find a way to fix things.
This is really simple to do all you need is Elmers white glue and Model Master Acryl Dark Gull Gray 4755 is the perfect match.
Then all you need to do it mix the paint with the glue really good and then use a wide flat brush and seal the gap once you do that you can take a damp cloth or wet finger or Q-tip and wipe off the extra paint and this is what you get...
Gap sealed no problems.
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k105/STARMAN39/IMG_7334.jpg
Great fix , but you should'nt need to do it , HM are dropping the ball IMPO , cheap price alone won't do anymore:mad:
SuperKungFu
30th April 2010, 09:36
Thanks to starman tips and a mod of my own *cough* stand *cough*....my F-22 looks pretty pimping
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y39/SuperKungFu/Model%20Airplane/DSC00241.jpg
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y39/SuperKungFu/Funny/CoolBird.jpg
RichardPrice
30th April 2010, 11:46
Picking mine up from Jumblies later today.
Not entirely convinced by the photos here - the colour scheme seems very 'toyish' and the panel lines are huge. Hope it looks better in the flesh.
Aeolus
30th April 2010, 11:55
Its better, but there are quality fluctuations especially regarding seams. If you can, try to find a good one but that will include opening the box.
Shawn 507
30th April 2010, 12:40
An alternate approach to the stand.
http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/uu276/BoogersDad/011-3.jpg
RichardPrice
30th April 2010, 14:18
Its certainly better in the flesh than in photos - acceptable :)
Dutchie
30th April 2010, 20:01
Thanks to starman tips and a mod of my own *cough* stand *cough*....my F-22 looks pretty pimping
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y39/SuperKungFu/Model%20Airplane/DSC00241.jpg
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y39/SuperKungFu/Funny/CoolBird.jpg
cool skf:cool: :cool: :cool: :)
planenuts
30th April 2010, 21:55
An alternate approach to the stand.
http://i655.photobucket.com/albums/uu276/BoogersDad/011-3.jpg
Nice stand!:eek: I'd like one of those!!!
mar_ji
1st May 2010, 23:20
Thanks to starman tips and a mod of my own *cough* stand *cough*....my F-22 looks pretty pimping
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y39/SuperKungFu/Model%20Airplane/DSC00241.jpg
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y39/SuperKungFu/Funny/CoolBird.jpg
I like that stand of century.....its a pity i missed the first issue of the raptor..here in holland...hopefully the second re-issue comes soon and surely get it....
Dutchie
1st May 2010, 23:34
I like that stand of century.....its a pity i missed the first issue of the raptor..here in holland...hopefully the second re-issue comes soon and surely get it....
LHshop seems to get new stock of this one:)
Cardinal
2nd May 2010, 00:38
The F-22 doesn't do much for me as a model - about as bland and awe inspiring as a UAV :rolleyes:.
Definitely lacks the 'mojo' of the F-14 Tomcat :D.
Shawn 507
2nd May 2010, 02:33
The F-22 doesn't do much for me as a model - about as bland and awe inspiring as a UAV :rolleyes:.
Definitely lacks the 'mojo' of the F-14 Tomcat :D.
Wiser words have not been spoken.;)
jaliya48
2nd May 2010, 03:48
Wiser words have not been spoken.;)
True:LOL:
Merlin
2nd May 2010, 03:58
SKF, have you ever thought about painting the base? IMO the worst part of the CW stands is seeing that rather unsightly base/post connection. A couple passes of Krylon pretty much takes care of that.
It's not like the base needs to be clear anyway.
http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l205/skunkwrx/IMG_2505.jpg
Shawn 507
2nd May 2010, 04:42
SKF, have you ever thought about painting the base? IMO the worst part of the CW stands is seeing that rather unsightly base/post connection. A couple passes of Krylon pretty much takes care of that.
It's not like the base needs to be clear anyway.
http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l205/skunkwrx/IMG_2505.jpg
I've done it to all of my CW stands. Definately improves them.
tc2324
11th May 2010, 20:25
Have to say I`m quite impressed with my Raptor.:)
http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac81/tc2324/032-5.jpg
http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac81/tc2324/034-3.jpg
http://i888.photobucket.com/albums/ac81/tc2324/033-2.jpg
Diamond nine
11th May 2010, 23:33
Looks pretty good to me to.Thanks for the pic's tc2324
Dutchie
12th May 2010, 08:22
nice pictures tc2324. :cool: :cool: :cool: ,
hope mine will land soon.:)
Dutchie
12th May 2010, 16:45
It landed this afternoon. And was'nt it at the 12th of May the right day:LOL:
A beautiful model, but............ pos. in the way of the development of new jets. It is a new design, so the Spitfire was a new design, that makes it interesting... and it's nice to see how things go on. Neg. in the way that it's like `SF`:rolleyes: , .... altough they are flying.
itīs a very nice model!!!!!!!!!!!:cool:
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff88/dutchie_393/013-13.jpg
shuttle
12th May 2010, 16:50
May the 12th - my birthday. This model has now gone onto my 'hit list' for Duxfiord on Sunday.
:D Shuttle
Fat Jabba
12th May 2010, 17:01
How are people finding the gap issues with the new HM Raptor? I got mine last week from one of our trusted forum sponsors and I can see daylight on the panels below the cockpit. I can't be bothered sending it back as the postage cost is too inhibitory. Nice model though.
zed550
12th May 2010, 17:56
the one i have has the gaps in the usual place but also other areas of poor assembly particularly underneath at the rear of one of the nozzles/tailplane joint.
it has not been stuck properly,some damage to the paint then touched up by brush.
not a problem for me as i will sand back and respray but i'm sure the average collector does not expect this.
have tinted the canopy and will be adding the extra detail that is missing on the framing.
wont be displaying gear down but the nose gear has been made without the
supporting strut behind the main leg.
Dutchie
12th May 2010, 22:01
May the 12th - my birthday. This model has now gone onto my 'hit list' for Duxfiord on Sunday.
:D Shuttle
After wishing you happy birthday I tought about that :LOL:
mar_ji
15th May 2010, 19:12
It landed this afternoon. And was'nt it at the 12th of May the right day:LOL:
A beautiful model, but............ pos. in the way of the development of new jets. It is a new design, so the Spitfire was a new design, that makes it interesting... and it's nice to see how things go on. Neg. in the way that it's like `SF`:rolleyes: , .... altough they are flying.
itīs a very nice model!!!!!!!!!!!:cool:
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff88/dutchie_393/013-13.jpg
got mine a couple of days ago....a really great lookin model....cant complain much though ....unless theres a better model to compare to....as they say....theres no such thing as perfect...am happy with my latest addition to my collection:D :cool
PhantomBigStu
15th May 2010, 19:46
finally ordered mine, can't wait for it to arrive, I actually have the origanal gaincorp one
Dutchie
15th May 2010, 21:18
got mine a couple of days ago....a really great lookin model....cant complain much though ....unless theres a better model to compare to....as they say....theres no such thing as perfect...am happy with my latest addition to my collection:D :cool
That's great mar_ji.... by the way ......good orange avatar you've got:) :) :)
sufapilot
18th May 2010, 06:04
I finally released my Raptor out of it's plastic packaging and after giving it a full inspection, I'm very happy to report that the only unsightly gap that needed "JP's seam-filling remedy" is on the portside panel area just under the forward cockpit. Other than that, everything esle looks pretty tight on my model. It passes my 3ft distance test. :LOL: ;)
I got the F-22 and i had the one with a eye sore gap .....Well i didn't let it bother me because in the past i have always manage to find a way to fix things.
This is really simple to do all you need is Elmers white glue and Model Master Acryl Dark Gull Gray 4755 is the perfect match.
Then all you need to do it mix the paint with the glue really good and then use a wide flat brush and seal the gap once you do that you can take a damp cloth or wet finger or Q-tip and wipe off the extra paint and this is what you get...
Gap sealed no problems.
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k105/STARMAN39/IMG_7334.jpg
SuperKungFu
30th May 2010, 01:49
Here is a visual guide to fixing the F-22 gaps just in case some of you haven't done so yet.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y39/SuperKungFu/Model%20Airplane/Repairinggaps.jpg
Therefore don't be afraid to buy this model if you haven't already, it's a great looking piece to add to the collection!
dilligafocau
30th May 2010, 01:54
Great stuff SKF and JP, even I could follow those steps ;)
VRob98
30th May 2010, 11:48
Thanks for posting the pics SKF. Unfortunately we can't get Model Master/ Testors paint here in the UK (unless anyone knows otherwise?) so it's a case of finding another acrylic grey that matches. Anybody know what the equivalent Tamiya acrylic might be?
Nighthawk
30th May 2010, 12:21
I bought some 4755 Dark Gull Grey from a great Polish outfit for just this use. 1.46 euro plus postage (4.59 euro). I also bought some Microscale products to make it worthwhile. Try http://www.model-making.eu. Rapid and reliable - in my case anyway.:)
VRob98
30th May 2010, 12:56
Thanks for the tip Nighthawk! I'll give em a go. :)
ACpilot
9th June 2010, 20:00
Latest arrival to the 1/72 Scale collection.
Rather late - but here is my attempt at pics.
Gaps not really a huge issue on mine.
Dan
:)
http://i877.photobucket.com/albums/ab340/ACpilot1/PICT0054-2.jpg
http://i877.photobucket.com/albums/ab340/ACpilot1/PICT0051.jpg
Diamond nine
9th June 2010, 23:07
Nice pics acpilot:) Your not to late with the pics.I just got mine today and like you no issue's with gaps.Great model,everything fine with my example.There is just so much good stuff coming out these days its hard to keep up sometimes.
Craig
9th June 2010, 23:31
Nice pics acpilot:) Your not to late with the pics.I just got mine today and like you no issue's with gaps.Great model,everything fine with my example.There is just so much good stuff coming out these days its hard to keep up sometimes.
Welcome to the club, felt like that for 10 Years now! :D
PhantomBigStu
30th July 2010, 10:40
pre pro up on HC for the next release
http://hobbymastercollector.com/HA2802F-22Elmendorf.html
Max Reheat
30th July 2010, 15:19
pre pro up on HC for the next release
http://hobbymastercollector.com/HA2802F-22Elmendorf.html
Had hoped that this one might have had the gold tint canopy as William hinted at on the US forum. I have contacted HM about this via the new email link on HC's page :).
Having seen one of these bad boys performing at Farnborough last week my need for one has increased, but I'm prepared to wait for that canopy.
kevjb64
30th July 2010, 15:44
Had hoped that this one might have had the gold tint canopy as William hinted at on the US forum. I have contacted HM about this via the new email link on HC's page :).
Having seen one of these bad boys performing at Farnborough last week my need for one has increased, but I'm prepared to wait for that canopy.
Its a bit of a bugger to get right apparently , the same kind of thing caused a bit of a delay in the TSR-2 .:)
johnnyboy
30th July 2010, 16:40
Had hoped that this one might have had the gold tint canopy as William hinted at on the US forum. I have contacted HM about this via the new email link on HC's page :).
Having seen one of these bad boys performing at Farnborough last week my need for one has increased, but I'm prepared to wait for that canopy.
This is a very easy fix all that is needed is a yellow food dye and some Johnson Klear and a small brush
Max Reheat
30th July 2010, 18:54
This is a very easy fix all that is needed is a yellow food dye and some Johnson Klear and a small brush
If that first one needs any more fixes they might as well have shipped it as a kit of parts, smaller box and cheaper shipping charges ;) :rolleyes:
highnoon1966
30th July 2010, 19:54
If that first one needs any more fixes they might as well have shipped it as a kit of parts, smaller box and cheaper shipping charges ;) :rolleyes:
Perhaps there thinking of diverting ther attention away from Corgi and instead fancy a crack at Airfix :LOL:
Max Reheat
3rd August 2010, 09:51
Had hoped that this one might have had the gold tint canopy as William hinted at on the US forum. I have contacted HM about this via the new email link on HC's page :).
By George it works! :) :cool
Had a reply back from William, the gold tint canopy will be on the production model. :)
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.