Edward Papazian
13th March 2011, 15:56
Yes, I'll admit it. I bought an Atlas TA-152 on eBay for somewhat more than it's worth rather than waiting 1-2 years for the model to show up via Oxford, thereby saving myself about $15. The model, itself has quite a lot of detail built into the basic tooling, however there are many issues---all a function of the low budget approach to this series and, I assume, allowing the factory to make decisions about what constitutes quality. Here are some of the basic faults;
1) No pilot figure and a fixed prop---typical of all models in this series.
2) No pitot head.
3) None of the antennae/direction finder stuff on the undersides.
4) One of the horizontal stabilizers was bent upward.
5) The part containing the spinner, props and a portion of the forward cowling was installed in an off center fashion.
6) The leading edges of the wings were squared off rather than being rounded.
7) Ugly screw holes on the undersides---again, typical of the whole series.
8) The wing root canon parts were badly fashioned add-ons that overlapped the main gear housing doors.
9) There was no canon mounted to fire through the spinner.
10) There was a large seam gap where the fuselage met the wings.
11) The Tail wheel was extended, not semi retracted.
Here's a picture of the original model from the top:
http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu75/Epapazian/P3100002.jpg
1) No pilot figure and a fixed prop---typical of all models in this series.
2) No pitot head.
3) None of the antennae/direction finder stuff on the undersides.
4) One of the horizontal stabilizers was bent upward.
5) The part containing the spinner, props and a portion of the forward cowling was installed in an off center fashion.
6) The leading edges of the wings were squared off rather than being rounded.
7) Ugly screw holes on the undersides---again, typical of the whole series.
8) The wing root canon parts were badly fashioned add-ons that overlapped the main gear housing doors.
9) There was no canon mounted to fire through the spinner.
10) There was a large seam gap where the fuselage met the wings.
11) The Tail wheel was extended, not semi retracted.
Here's a picture of the original model from the top:
http://i635.photobucket.com/albums/uu75/Epapazian/P3100002.jpg