PDA

View Full Version : short stop herc


eismeer
14th December 2004, 22:48
This was sent to me by a friend :eek: Thought you might like to share it.

On November 4, 1979, Iranian militants stormed the United States Embassy in
Tehran and took approximately seventy Americans captive. This terrorist act
lasted 444 days and during this period the US tried to think of several ways
to set the hostages free.

One revolutionary idea was to land a C-130 Hercules at a soccer field near
the hostage site and set the hostages free with military force. As a soccer
field in the middle of a city is virtually impossible to use as a landing
site, the USAF had to make drastic conversions to their aircraft in order to
even think of a chance of success.

The result was the "Credible Sport" project, in which four regular C-130H
aircraft were converted into YMC-130H specials with ESTOL (Extremely Short
Take Off and Landing) capabilities. In order to achieve the ultra short
landing and take-off, several rockets had to be installed to force the
aircraft to a quick stop and get it back airborne with a full load of people
within 300 feet. It was determined that 180,000 of thrust, equal to nearly
20 times the C-130's standard turboprop engines, would be required to get a
C-130 off in the length of a soccer field and over the surrounding
obstructions. The plane would be 300 feet in the air after traveling 300
feet forward and with a take off roll of just 100 feet.

Forward pointing rockets were installed to provide reverse thrust during
landing, as well as downward pointed rockets to cushon the landing. In order
to bring such a heavy aircraft to a quick stop, the amount of rocket power
was unprecedented. Needless to say that this aircraft had to be tested
before it could be used in action, and unfortunately the first test flight
did not go as planned.

See the test for yourself at http://www.dappa.nl/crash.htm

Just click on the bottom where it says "Aircraft crash 23".

Clansman
15th December 2004, 10:30
Do you think we can get Corgi to make one? Maybe a before and after!

The Defiant Man
15th December 2004, 19:31
"excessively hard landing" seems a bit of an understatement :eek:

ForkTailedDevil
15th December 2004, 20:00
If you want a short landing Hercules, how about the one that landed and took off from the USS Forrestal back in 1963. It was a KC130F on loan from the USMC. No tail hook, no rocket brakes. Lockheed fitted a better anti-skid system, removed the refueling pods and scaled back on the size of the nose wheel. Lt.James H. Flatley III then landed the plane and took off again. A total of 29 touch and goes and 21 unarrested landing and unassisted take offs. They didn't even roll the Herc back for take off. It just made its take off run from where it stopped when it landed.

Lt Flatley got a Distinguished Flying Cross for his skills and the Landing Signals officer eventually got promoted to Captain and assigned to Naval Air Systems Command.

Agent X20
15th December 2004, 23:36
Ouch.. they should have gone for a ****** great chute or anchor out the back..

Hercs were/are fairly good STOL airplanes anyway.. If yer can get a B 25 offa carrier you must be able to get a c130 off as I would have thought the power to weight ratio was better.. ( Its just getting a fully laden Herc off the deck that might hurt...!!!)

ForkTailedDevil
16th December 2004, 00:07
They did make full use of head winds etc

http://www.airspacemag.com/asm/web/site/QT/hercon.html

They have the take off video aswell.

eismeer
16th December 2004, 03:12
FTD.

If that c-130 touchdown had been a couple of feet shorter they would have been digging it out of the stern of that carrier. Suppose he wanted to make use of every available inch of deck just in case of any mishap and had to get airborne again.

Wonder if he tried a night landing :eek: