Go Back   The Diecast Aviation Web Site and Forum > Events > Airshows & Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #21  
Old 9th March 2010
zed550's Avatar
zed550 zed550 is offline
Air Commodore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cheshire,uk
Posts: 2,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent X20 View Post
Thought another Tristar (grey) had been done - if all the vocals at Luton were to be believed....

VC10 super.. from Gemini.. ( cough Jimmy Chimp...) I'll buy it....
tristar needs a few add on bits apparently
__________________
time for a milky brew
Reply With Quote

  #22  
Old 9th March 2010
Shawn 507's Avatar
Shawn 507 Shawn 507 is offline
Group Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ft. Benning, GA
Posts: 1,368
Default

The C-17 looks good, the Charleston gang are old friends. Is GA going forward with the Skyraider? Like the Camouflaged Phantom, will be getting that one. Pity the GA customer service folks don't answer their mail. Still need the missing gear doors for my RN 004 Phantom.
__________________
Pacifism, a philosophy of non violence, historically only practiced by those who rely on the killing and dying of others in defense of their priviledge to practice that philosophy.

Last edited by Shawn 507 : 9th March 2010 at 01:08.
Reply With Quote

  #23  
Old 9th March 2010
hworth18's Avatar
hworth18 hworth18 is offline
Group Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma USA
Posts: 1,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent X20 View Post
Dunno about a summary execution Harry, but IMPO in this day and age, that sort of casting, that type of mold, irrespective of subject matter..... should never have gotten offa the drawing board..
Then maybe a caning behind the shop? 50 lashes?

The overall shape looks good as does the canopy shape, But if HM releases these as is, mine will be stripped, the joints filled and repainted.. Just can't have it looking like this.

Last edited by hworth18 : 9th March 2010 at 01:37.
Reply With Quote

  #24  
Old 9th March 2010
Elmer's Avatar
Elmer Elmer is offline
Squadron Leader
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rocky Mountain West, USA
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Defiant Man View Post
Gotta agree with Agent about the P-51's joint over the nose and everything needs tightening up by the look of it, including the wobbly u/c....
I am sure the undercarriage can be fixed. The tooling placing the join lines across the nose and the wing root? Highly doubtful. Tightening up will help a little, but the fundamental problem will remain. This tooling has got to be HM's worse design yet... and done to such an iconic subject? Whoever tooled this and approved it didn't do it with any TLC. A miracle isn't going to save this tooling. The best miracle that can be hoped for is HM cuts its losses and cancels the release.
__________________
Preserving the memory of the Wayne H. Nelson Liberator Aircrew (458th BG, 754th BS): http://www.458bg.com/crewnelson.htm
Reply With Quote

  #25  
Old 9th March 2010
Hornchurch's Avatar
Hornchurch Hornchurch is offline
Wing Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmer View Post

...but the fundamental problem will remain.

This tooling has got to be HM's worse design yet...

.....and done to such an iconic subject?

Whoever tooled this and approved it didn't do it with any TLC.

A miracle isn't going to save this tooling.

The best miracle that can be hoped for is HM cuts its losses and cancels the release.
`



Sadly, I reckon you've got more chance of being bitten by Napolean's Dog

Various are "assuring" us that this "final product" won't have those "upside-down speech bubble" join-lines (or, if they are, they won't be as loose as a 'Whore's-Drawers'........yeah I'll believe it when I see it)


As you say; an 'iconic' plane (one I would've thought MIGHT be treated sympathetically).



I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T expect to "have to" lash-out the lions share of £ 40 & then be expected to buy a tube (or TWO) of Squadron-Signal Body-Putty (filler) in order to "put things right".....

Kinda defeats the object of buying diecast in the 1st place.


Thank God Tamiya do a decent 48th kit (of which I bought loads in the '90s)

Personally, I can't see 'em changing their tooling (call me a born-cynic)


BTW Elmer (B), I'd re-phrase that line you wrote..."whoever tooled this..." (towards the end) with, "needs shooting" instead of your (polite) "didn't do it with any TLC"............ (too-kind, by far )


`
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
North Creake 199 Sqdn

Short Stirling = 'bring it on'

Last edited by Hornchurch : 9th March 2010 at 02:14.
Reply With Quote

  #26  
Old 9th March 2010
Ducktape Corkfeet Ducktape Corkfeet is offline
Flight Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 110
Default

Yip, that Mustang's a right lemon, horrible joins. The Arrow on the other hand looks like it'll be the diecast to have....dare I say perfect? Will wait for 201 to go with my TSR.2.
WANT! WANT! WANT! that C-17, but like most I'll wait for an RAF one. The Camo Phantom has been at the top of my wishlist for years, so I'll be getting that. I'm only sorry Corgi couldn't have sorted that one alot sooner though.
Skyraider looks phenomenal for those interested. The Raptor I still find too toy-like in my opinion.
Reply With Quote

  #27  
Old 9th March 2010
Hornchurch's Avatar
Hornchurch Hornchurch is offline
Wing Commander
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducktape Corkfeet View Post

Yip, that Mustang's a right lemon, horrible joins. .
`



" I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T expect to "have to" lash-out the lions share of £ 40 & then be expected to buy a tube (or TWO) of Squadron-Signal Body-Putty (filler) in order to "put things right".....

Kinda defeats the object of buying diecast in the 1st place. "






I've found some "therapy" for Elmer.....


Try these mate.....



_01Independent-Projects_03Speech-Bubbles_Bubble.jpg

_01Independent-Projects_03Speech-Bubbles_Bubble_edited-copy.jpg



Look closely & jiggle them around a bit = will help you "acclimatise".....



`
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
North Creake 199 Sqdn

Short Stirling = 'bring it on'

Last edited by Hornchurch : 9th March 2010 at 03:02.
Reply With Quote

  #28  
Old 9th March 2010
Elmer's Avatar
Elmer Elmer is offline
Squadron Leader
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rocky Mountain West, USA
Posts: 404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornchurch View Post
`

Sadly, I reckon you've got more chance of being bitten by Napolean's Dog

`
You are right HC. And sadly the dog's bite would be much less painful than accepting this tooling as the D Mustang standard at 1/48 for the next umpteenth years.

I will never look at speech bubbles the same... ever again. They will always be a painful reminder of what could have been. Within the bubble I will never see text but putty.

Thanks for cheering me up, HC! At least you gave me a laugh at the expense of HM. But I do not think I can acclamatise, mate.
__________________
Preserving the memory of the Wayne H. Nelson Liberator Aircrew (458th BG, 754th BS): http://www.458bg.com/crewnelson.htm
Reply With Quote

  #29  
Old 9th March 2010
sufapilot's Avatar
sufapilot sufapilot is offline
Squadron Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 295
Default

The GA RAF camo'd Phantom IS very nice! Definitely getting one of those.
__________________
HM, please make this one next?
Reply With Quote

  #30  
Old 9th March 2010
The Defiant Man's Avatar
The Defiant Man The Defiant Man is offline
Air Vice-Marshal
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 6,718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zed550 View Post
skyraider is a rough casting mock up,mostly hand finished at the factory apart from a few minor details added so is not even up to prepro standard.
Ok, that no doubt explains its rough appearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elmer View Post
I am sure the undercarriage can be fixed. The tooling placing the join lines across the nose and the wing root? Highly doubtful. Tightening up will help a little, but the fundamental problem will remain. This tooling has got to be HM's worse design yet... and done to such an iconic subject? Whoever tooled this and approved it didn't do it with any TLC. A miracle isn't going to save this tooling. The best miracle that can be hoped for is HM cuts its losses and cancels the release.
I was being kind in my assessment .....not got involved on this one on it's own thread because it is of no interest to me anyway (interesting thread to read though ).
Reply With Quote

  #31  
Old 9th March 2010
sniperUK's Avatar
sniperUK sniperUK is offline
Air Commodore
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 4,337
Default

The JP looks good, I will need a few of them , the 43 Sqn phantom is now ordered and with the GJ Skyraider I hope we do get the FAA AEW now.The C-17 if it appears in RAF markings will be joining the list as will a grey Tristar if it's made.
__________________
"I am not an Ulsterman but yesterday the 1st of July as I followed their amazing attack I felt I would rather be an Ulsterman than anything else in the world......" .Cpt WB Spender the Somme 1916
Reply With Quote

  #32  
Old 9th March 2010
blue steel blue steel is offline
Air Commodore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bedford
Posts: 2,111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent X20 View Post
Skyraider..... More Gemini vs Hobbymaster sh*t then or 'tother way round.... ... : FFS about time they started talking so as the punters dont end up with two molds.... what a waste.... there is so much else that could have been done.. this is getting as bad as civvie world.... One day no L188's.. now we have four separate molds.. and still no soddin Trident...

C17 looks a fair old bit of kit though and the F4 looks (for me) as though it should fly... wait till the rivet counters get their myopic viewpoint across...

That P-51.. whatever you do, get rid of the vertical joint line... I could build kits like that at 3 years old.. NOT acceptable on diecast.... It's far too messy around the nose and wing joint to be considered acceptable as a model going forward (2010 and all that) .... DYAF..... scrap it now....
Although to be fair, the Gemini Skyraider wasn't a secret so no talking necessary HM just saw the potential of getting the Skyraider done first although it looks as though the Gemini model won't be too far behind
Reply With Quote

  #33  
Old 9th March 2010
Seafire47 Seafire47 is offline
Wing Commander
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 575
Default

If you delve back to the very beginning of the HM Release Information thread, you'll see that HM had plans to produce the Skyraider back in 2007. (In post #2 Sniper was hoping for an RN AEW version! ). They also had a load of other models in the pipeline and after Gemini unveiled their Skyraider prototype (along with the Spey Phantom) HM dropped out of the race.

However with the huge delays that Gemini hit and the uncertainty whether we'd ever see any new castings from them, HM obviously decided it was worth dusting off their plans for the Skyraider and going for it. (They managed to announce their Phantom, develop it and get 3 or 4 production models out of the door in the time it took Gemini to go from their prototype to the first, badly recieved production models.) I seem to remember that at the time the decision was very well received as most of us had given up any hope of seeing Gemini's Skyraider.

Whether it's worth Gemini proceding with their Skyraider now that they've been beaten to the punch by HM only time will tell. (Echoes of Corgi's A-10 and A-4?) I just hope that we get an RN AEW version from someone!

Last edited by Seafire47 : 9th March 2010 at 15:21.
Reply With Quote

  #34  
Old 9th March 2010
Max Reheat's Avatar
Max Reheat Max Reheat is offline
Group Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seafire47 View Post
I just hope that we get an RN AEW version from someone!
Can't argue with that, and given that Gemini have this one tooled already maybe its an ideal one for them to launch with and beat HM at its own game especially in the UK market. However, given HM's Skyraider quality and lower price (based on HM vs. GA Phantoms) maybe I should shut up and wait for HM to get a round tuit
__________________
Marching on Together
Reply With Quote

  #35  
Old 9th March 2010
Max Reheat's Avatar
Max Reheat Max Reheat is offline
Group Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFBC View Post
Oxford Diecast also had a good mixtures of aircraft in their cabinet which looked quite interesting and a blend of manufacturers tools now being used, but my images are pi$$poor....
CFBC (or Zed), any sign (or even crap pics ) of Oxford's WW2 Meteor/V1 combo as seen in Nuremberg? I contacted Oxford recently about this but other than saying its not announced yet and they have about 40 aircraft in their range, I didn't get any joy.

Cheers.
__________________
Marching on Together
Reply With Quote

  #36  
Old 9th March 2010
zed550's Avatar
zed550 zed550 is offline
Air Commodore
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: cheshire,uk
Posts: 2,551
Default

all atlas stuff were in a cabinet hence probably why CFBC's pics were not too good to show you.
i did'nt bother as the range holds no interest to me.as to the skyraider you may find the comparisons of interest and as a certain person thinks i will be bias with my involvement i will be dealing with basically the pros,cons accuracy etc particularly of the kits that were used as both company starting points you can then judge for yourself.
__________________
time for a milky brew
Reply With Quote

  #37  
Old 9th March 2010
von hitchofen's Avatar
von hitchofen von hitchofen is online now
Air Commodore
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincolnshire, near 100 Sqn memorial
Posts: 3,667
Default



nice



very nice



very nice indeed....
__________________
Achtung, hier kommen sie wieder, die letzten fünfzig Spitfires
A popular saying among German aviators, seventy years ago
Reply With Quote

  #38  
Old 9th March 2010
Nimrod48's Avatar
Nimrod48 Nimrod48 is offline
Group Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Shropshire UK
Posts: 1,228
Post

The GA Phantom is a beauty only problem is where do I find a F C Hunter to keep it company
__________________
"All modern aircraft have four dimensions: span, length, height and politics. TSR.2 simply got the first three right."
- Sir Sydney Camm
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:38.


vBulletin style developed by Transverse Styles

The Diecast Aviation Web Site and Forum - Powered by vBulletin software
Copyright © 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.